DSpace
 

EMU I-REP >
02 Faculty of Engineering >
Department of Civil Engineering >
CE – Journal Articles: Publisher & Author Versions (Post-Print Author Versions) – Civil Engineering >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11129/2369

Title: Some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes
Authors: Kazemi, K Akhavan
Eren, Özgür
Rezaei, Alireza
Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering
Keywords: Environmental impact
Recycled concrete aggregates
Natural concrete aggregates
Concrete strength
Freeze-thaw resistance
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Kazemi K, Eren Ö, Rezaei A, “some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering, International Journal of Science and Technology, (accepted in April 2015).
Kazemi K, Eren Ö, Rezaei A, “some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering, International Journal of Science and Technology, (accepted in April 2015).
Abstract: This paper describes an experimental study conducted to investigate the properties of concretes produced with recycled aggregates and normal aggregates for two different concrete classes (C20/25, C30/37). Tests of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, rebound hammer, wet and dry density, and freeze-thaw resistance were conducted on specimens of the concretes. Moreover, slump test was conducted on fresh concrete. The results showed that the slump of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) was less than that of Normal Aggregate Concrete (NAC). For class C20/25, the average compressive strength, rebound hammer, and density of the RAC were 26%, 17%, and 16.6% less, respectively, than those of NAC. The splitting tensile strength of RAC was 3.5% greater than that of NAC. Moreover, for C30/37 the average compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, rebound hammer, and density of the RAC were 32.5%, 12%, 21% and 30% less, respectively, than those of NAC. For classes C20/25 and C30/37, the ultrasonic pulse velocities of RAC were 17% and 18%, respectively, smaller than those of NAC, RAC for C20/25 lost 2.5% more weight than NAC in freeze-thaw resistance tests and RAC for C30/37 lost 29% more weight than NAC in this test.
Description: Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the publisher version (published version) of this article is only available via subscription. You may have access to the Publisher Version of this article through the publisher web site or online databases, if your Library or institution has subscription to the related journal or publication.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11129/2369
ISSN: 1026-3098
Appears in Collections:CE – Journal Articles: Publisher & Author Versions (Post-Print Author Versions) – Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



This item is protected by original copyright

Recommend this item
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback