Some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes

EMU I-REP

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kazemi, K Akhavan
dc.contributor.author Eren, Özgür
dc.contributor.author Rezaei, Alireza
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-25T20:30:31Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-25T20:30:31Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Kazemi K, Eren Ö, Rezaei A, “some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering, International Journal of Science and Technology, (accepted in April 2015). en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kazemi K, Eren Ö, Rezaei A, “some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering, International Journal of Science and Technology, (accepted in April 2015).
dc.identifier.issn 1026-3098
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11129/2369
dc.description Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the publisher version (published version) of this article is only available via subscription. You may have access to the Publisher Version of this article through the publisher web site or online databases, if your Library or institution has subscription to the related journal or publication. en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper describes an experimental study conducted to investigate the properties of concretes produced with recycled aggregates and normal aggregates for two different concrete classes (C20/25, C30/37). Tests of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, rebound hammer, wet and dry density, and freeze-thaw resistance were conducted on specimens of the concretes. Moreover, slump test was conducted on fresh concrete. The results showed that the slump of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) was less than that of Normal Aggregate Concrete (NAC). For class C20/25, the average compressive strength, rebound hammer, and density of the RAC were 26%, 17%, and 16.6% less, respectively, than those of NAC. The splitting tensile strength of RAC was 3.5% greater than that of NAC. Moreover, for C30/37 the average compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, rebound hammer, and density of the RAC were 32.5%, 12%, 21% and 30% less, respectively, than those of NAC. For classes C20/25 and C30/37, the ultrasonic pulse velocities of RAC were 17% and 18%, respectively, smaller than those of NAC, RAC for C20/25 lost 2.5% more weight than NAC in freeze-thaw resistance tests and RAC for C30/37 lost 29% more weight than NAC in this test. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Environmental impact en_US
dc.subject Recycled concrete aggregates en_US
dc.subject Natural concrete aggregates en_US
dc.subject Concrete strength en_US
dc.subject Freeze-thaw resistance en_US
dc.title Some mechanical properties of normal and recycled aggregate concretes en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal Scientia Iranica en_US
dc.contributor.department Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering en_US
dc.identifier.volume 22 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 6 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record