A Comparative study of Islamic and Conventional Banks Risk Management Operating in QISMUT Countries

EMU I-REP

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Bektaş, Eralp
dc.contributor.author Kmaly, Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned 2019-12-26T12:36:13Z
dc.date.available 2019-12-26T12:36:13Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09
dc.date.submitted 2017
dc.identifier.citation Kmaly, Ahmed. (2017). A Comparative study of Islamic and Conventional Banks Risk Management Operating in QISMUT Countries. Thesis (M.S.), Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Dept. of Banking and Finance, Famagusta: North Cyprus. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11129/4235
dc.description Master of Science in Banking and Finance. Thesis (M.S.)--Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Dept. of Banking and Finance, 2017. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Eralp Bektaş. en_US
dc.description.abstract The clue of a good financial management for any bank or financial institution is risk management. The most important part of the process of risk management is to identify and determine the source of risk. This study is carried out in order to identify and analyze the factors that influence credit risk, liquidity risk and capital risk of both Islamic and conventional banks in QISMUT countries (Qatar, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, UAE and Turkey) during the period from 2011 to 2015 taking in to consideration answering research question if determinants of risk in Islamic banking sector are the same as conventional banking sector or not. Concerning credit risk log of bank size is only common factor that significantly affects both Islamic and conventional banks. Bank fund management is the only factor that shows significant impact to both Islamic and conventional banks. Deposits structure is considered to be the only significant factor that influence capital adequacy of both Islamic and conventional banks. From the investigated factors for each risk there is only factor which has significant impact on Islamic and conventional banks. This indicates that there is a big difference in the factors that influence risk in Islamic and conventional banks and this may be due to the factors mentioned in chapter 1 that differentiate Islamic banking from conventional banking. Keywords: Islamic banks, Conventional banks, Credit risk, Liquidity risk, Capital risk. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU) - Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ) en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Banking and Finance en_US
dc.subject Banks and Banking-Islamic Banking-Conventional Banking en_US
dc.subject Islamic banks en_US
dc.subject Conventional banks en_US
dc.subject Liquidity risk en_US
dc.subject Capital risk en_US
dc.subject Credit risk en_US
dc.title A Comparative study of Islamic and Conventional Banks Risk Management Operating in QISMUT Countries en_US
dc.type masterThesis en_US
dc.contributor.department Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Dept. of Banking and Finance en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record