Building Code Challenging the Ethics behind Adobe Architecture in North Cyprus

EMU I-REP

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hurol, Yonca
dc.contributor.author Yuceer, Hulya
dc.contributor.author Sahali, Oznem
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-15T06:38:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-15T06:38:43Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Hurol, Y., Yuceer, H., Şahali, O., (2014) “Building Code Challenging the Ethics behind Adobe Architecture in North Cyprus” Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol:21. No:2. pp.381-399. DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9533-0 . en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11129/4387
dc.description This article argues that building codes might be so restricting and causing problems that use of a certain structural material (adobe) might end in a country, although the vernacular architecture of that country was with that material. en_US
dc.description.abstract Adobe masonry takes place within the vernacular architecture of Cyprus. Thus, it is possible to use this technology in a meaningful way on the island. On the other hand, although adobe architecture is more sustainable in comparison to other building technologies, the use of it is diminishing in North Cyprus. Application of Turkish building codes at the north part of the island made the use of adobe masonry complicated, because this building code asks use of reinforced concrete vertical tie-beams together with adobe masonry. Use of reinforced concrete elements together with adobe masonry causes problems in relation to climatic response of the building as well as causing other technical and aesthetic problems. This situation makes design of adobe masonry complicated and causes appearance of ethical problems of various types too. The objective of this article is to analyse the ethical problems due to the restrictive character of the building code by analyzing two case studies and conducting an interview with an architect who was involved with adobe masonry in North Cyprus. According to the results of this article there are ethical problems at various levels in the design of the two cases. These problems are about the responsibilities of architects concerning architecture`s social benefit, material production, aesthetics and affordability as well as presenting distrustful behaviour when the obligations of architects to their clients is concerned. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship NA en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Springer Publishing en_US
dc.rights open access en_US
dc.subject building code, adobe construction, ethics en_US
dc.title Building Code Challenging the Ethics behind Adobe Architecture in North Cyprus en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal Science and Engineering Ethics en_US
dc.contributor.department Department of Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.volume 21 en_US
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 381 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 399 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record