Is there a net economic loss from employing reference class forecasting in the appraisal of hydropower projects?

dc.contributor.authorJenkins, G.
dc.contributor.authorOlasehinde-Williams, G.
dc.contributor.authorBaurzhan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:42:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the potential effects of the use of reference class forecasting on the World Bank's financing decisions, and quantifies the net economic impact of such decisions in the long run. A set of 57 World Bank-financed hydropower projects constructed between 1975 and 2015 was selected based on data availability. The findings show that reference class forecasting can help reduce net losses by preventing some hydropower projects with negative economic net present values from being executed. However, it also leads to the forfeiture of even larger amounts of net economic benefits by causing the rejection of some projects that are found, from ex-post analysis, to be economically worthwhile. Furthermore, because of the increased ex-ante rejection of projects, the loss of potentially economically positive projects from the portfolio of hydro dam projects is greatly increased. The errors in the estimation of economic net present values of these hydropower projects are highly positively correlated to the errors in the estimation of the benefits and only weakly negatively correlated to the errors in the estimation of costs.
dc.description.sponsorshipIndependent Evaluation Group of the World Bank
dc.description.sponsorshipThe assistance and suggestions of Nouraddine Berrah, Migara Jayawardena, and Sergio Rivera-Zeballos during a prior study from which this paper has evolved are greatly appreciated. The research project from which the data used in this paper is taken was funded by the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank. The authors are solely responsible for all views reflected, all conclusions reached, and any errors found in this study. Neither the World Bank nor any of its staff are responsible for any of the views expressed or the conclusions reached in this paper.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2022.112218
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.issn1879-0690
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3710-6146
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4416-0164
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124168884
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112218
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/13389
dc.identifier.volume159
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000788157500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectReference class forecasting
dc.subjectPlanners' fallacy
dc.subjectHydropower
dc.subjectCost overruns
dc.subjectEconomic welfare
dc.subjectWorld bank
dc.titleIs there a net economic loss from employing reference class forecasting in the appraisal of hydropower projects?
dc.typeArticle

Files