Engaging Both Sides: Dual Track Diplomacy and Dialogue in Cameroon

dc.contributor.authorFon, Nguh Nwei Asanga
dc.contributor.authorAchiri, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe crisis in the Anglophone regions of Cameroon that began as a protest by teachers and lawyers trade unions in late 2016 is becoming an intractable conflict which if not addressed risks destabilizing the entire Central African sub-region. Using Zartman's “ripeness” as a theoretical premise, this paper analyses the evolution of the conflict and proposes dual track diplomacy as a possible solution to break the present deadlock. Given the difficulties for both sides to escalate their way to victory and the growing, unsustainable cost of a prolonged confrontation, the present situation shows significant traces of a mutually hurting stalemate that we propose can be exploited by actors interested in resolution of the conflict. The need for and possible policy implications of pursuing a dual track diplomatic approach is explored here. It is obvious that dual track diplomacy can contribute greatly to bringing a lasting solution to the Anglophone crisis. © 2021 University of Florida Board of Trustees. All Rights Reserved.
dc.identifier.endpage94
dc.identifier.issn2152-2448
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85110557624
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage80
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/8420
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Florida
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Studies Quarterly
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260204
dc.subjectAnglophone crisis
dc.subjectCameroon
dc.subjectdual track diplomacy
dc.subjectripeness theory
dc.titleEngaging Both Sides: Dual Track Diplomacy and Dialogue in Cameroon
dc.typeArticle

Files