Aggregation of Risk Management and Non-Parametric Models to Rank Failure Modes of Radio Frequency Identification Systems

dc.contributor.authorChnina, Khaoula
dc.contributor.authorDaneshvar, Sahand
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractFeatured Application The method is applied to the RFID system but can be implemented to assess the risks of any other equipment or process.Abstract The failure mode causes and effects analysis (FMCEA) is a commonly used reliability approach. It identifies, predicts, and analyzes potential failure modes affecting the proper function of equipment or the process under study, along with their roots and consequences. FMCEA aims to evaluate and assess the risks resulting from their occurrence, intending to suggest corresponding repair, adjustment, and precautionary measures to be planned during the conception, instruction, or implementation stages. However, the FMCEA has been criticized in the literature for its many inherent shortcomings related to risk assessment and prioritization. Therefore, this study presents an enhanced FMCEA method to address the deficiencies of the traditional risk priority number (RPN) and improve the reliability of risk assessments and corrective actions. A data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric method, is used to evaluate the efficiency of these failures by considering their fixing time and cost and deciding on their final priority ranks. Sub-failure modes and their interrelationships are also taken into account. The radio frequency identification (RFID) system was chosen as an example due to its core role in Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT) to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of the proposed method. A total of 67 failures related to both hardware and software parts, including the environmental impacts of this technology, have been disclosed. The results of the conventional and the suggested FMCEA methods are found to be considerably different, with ten failure modes classified as being the most efficient.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app14020584
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6451-6290
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8597-3463
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192489834
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app14020584
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/9989
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001149202900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences-Basel
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectrisk management
dc.subjectdata envelopment analysis (DEA)
dc.subjectRFID system
dc.subjectFMEA enhancement
dc.subjectfailure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
dc.subjectrisk priority number (RPN)
dc.subjectIndustry 4.0
dc.subjectInternet of Things (IoT)
dc.titleAggregation of Risk Management and Non-Parametric Models to Rank Failure Modes of Radio Frequency Identification Systems
dc.typeArticle

Files