Comparative analysis of Escherichia coli contamination on fresh produce at the market: human handling is a significant parameter of contamination

dc.contributor.authorGuran, Mumtaz
dc.contributor.authorSanliturk, Gizem
dc.contributor.authorHadid, Zoubida
dc.contributor.authorHadid, Karima
dc.contributor.authorAksay, Birsu
dc.contributor.authorRahhal, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Nimet Ilke
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the effect of human handling on E. coli contamination of fresh produce (FP) in the overlooked market stage where customers touch FP. Study includes an observational and a comparative part with 3 experimental sample groups as; (i) Control group (CG), (ii) Touched FP group (TG) and (iii) FP touched with gloves group (GG). In the comparative part, generic E. coli and Shiga toxin producer E. coli (STEC) were screened, quantified and analyzed for antibiotic susceptibilities. The average score of sellers' knowledge level was low (39%). E. coli counts from banana, lettuce, carrot and tomato were found to be significantly higher (p=0.037, p=0.046, p=0.046 and p=0.034 respectively) in TG compared to CG which indicates human handling as a significant factor of bacterial contamination in the market. E. coli counts were significantly lower for banana, lettuce and tomato in GG (p=0.037, p=0.001, p=0.034 respectively) which is probative for the dissemination at the market through human handling and is also indicating this as a useful/practical prevention tool. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC-O157:H7) was isolated only from one lettuce sample in TG. The highest resistance rate was observed for ampicillin (44%), followed by cephalothin (40%), tetracycline (24%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic (24%). Here, we demonstrate that human handling of FP in the market stage is a significant contributing factor in E. coli contamination, which may include STEC. Furthermore, our findings suggest that this contamination is preventable by using practical materials such as gloves.
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v23i1.9963
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1536-8831
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5111-7458
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5096-069X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104441451
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v23i1.9963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/10778
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000636784700048
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMattioli 1885
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Nutrition
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectFruit
dc.subjectvegetable
dc.subjectfresh produce
dc.subjectE. coli
dc.subjectmarket
dc.subjectcontamination
dc.titleComparative analysis of Escherichia coli contamination on fresh produce at the market: human handling is a significant parameter of contamination
dc.typeArticle

Files