Miscommunication: The Other of Communication or the Otherness of Communication?

dc.contributor.authorIlter, Tugrul
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractUnlike most studies of miscommunication, which understand it as the opposite other of communication, I reconceptualize it in this article as involving the otherness of communication. Using the resources of deconstruction, and taking into consideration the irreducible necessity of mediation through an other, I rethink communication without reducing its complexity. My rethinking is inspired by deconstructive readings of Austin's How to Do Things With Words and Lacan's Seminar on The Purloined Letter. In the end, I contend that miscommunication cannot be definitively separated from communication, indicating communication's differential makeup. Miscommunication uncannily resides in communication.
dc.identifier.endpage277
dc.identifier.issn1932-8036
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85010426180
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage259
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/9171
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000390929500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUsc Annenberg Press
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Communication
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectmiscommunication
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectdissemination
dc.subjectiterability
dc.subjectadestination
dc.titleMiscommunication: The Other of Communication or the Otherness of Communication?
dc.typeArticle

Files