Effectiveness of dry needling versus a classical physiotherapy program in patients with chronic low-back pain: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorTüzün, Emine Handan
dc.contributor.authorGıldır, Sila
dc.contributor.authorAngin, Ender
dc.contributor.authorTecer, Büşra Hande
dc.contributor.authorDana, Kezban Öztürk
dc.contributor.authorMalkoç, Mehtap
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T17:58:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstract[Purpose] We compared the effectiveness of dry needling with a classical physiotherapy program in patients with chronic low-back pain caused by lumbar disc hernia (LHNP). [Subjects and Methods] In total, 34 subjects were allocated randomly to the study (n=18) and control groups (n=16). In the study group, dry needling was applied using acupuncture needles. The control group performed a home exercise program in addition to hot pack, TENS, and ultrasound applications. Pain was assessed with the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The number of trigger points and their pressure sensitivity were evaluated with a physical examination (palpation). The Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess depression. The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale was used to assess fear of movement. [Results] In the study group, the calculated Cohen’s effect sizes were bigger than those in the control group in terms of pain, trigger point-related variables, and fear of movement. Effect sizes for reducing depressive symptoms were similar in both groups. [Conclusion] These results suggest that dry needling can be an effective treatment for reducing pain, number of trigger points, sensitivity, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic lowback pain caused by lumbar disc hernia. © 2017 The Society of Physical Therapy Science.
dc.identifier.doi10.1589/jpts.29.1502
dc.identifier.endpage1509
dc.identifier.issn0915-5287
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029586176
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage1502
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1502
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/7776
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety of Physical Therapy Science (Rigaku Ryoho Kagakugakkai) inui@ipec-pub.co.jp
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Physical Therapy Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260204
dc.subjectDry needling
dc.subjectLow-back pain
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy
dc.titleEffectiveness of dry needling versus a classical physiotherapy program in patients with chronic low-back pain: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
dc.typeArticle

Files