Predicting the volatility of Bitcoin returns based on kernel regression

dc.contributor.authorSanli, Sera
dc.contributor.authorBalcilar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzmen, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:34:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractNonparametric regression has become a popular method because it offers great flexibility in data modeling without requiring a precise description of the functional forms of estimated models. With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, Bitcoin, a historically volatile cryptocurrency, has emerged as one of the most contentious issues due to the potential for banknotes to facilitate the transmission of viruses. This paper aimed to predict the volatility of Bitcoin returns using squared and original returns as proxies for volatility and to perform the quantile estimation for different prediction horizons for the period September 17th, 2014-March 13th, 2020 by implementing a kernel regression approach based on the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA), presenting the comparison results along with various volatility predictors, and employing cross-validation. When handling generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) and EWMA predictors jointly for the prediction horizon of one beginning in mid-2017, aggregated EWMA and Heston-Nandi (HN) GARCH(1,1) predictors outperformed the standard GARCH(1,1) predictor, and among EWMA predictors, aggregated predictors are superior when skewness parameter is less than 0.5. In addition, for a prediction horizon of 1 day, GARCH(1,1) volatility as the kernel predictor has outperformed the standard GARCH(1,1) predictor over all time periods. However, as the prediction horizon is expanded above 10, the EWMA volatility performs better than GARCH volatility.
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK (Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey)-BIDEB (Scientist Support Department)
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Jussi Klemelae for sharing the codes for volatility analysis. The authors are also grateful to the TUBITAK (Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey)-BIDEB (Scientist Support Department) and their personnel for their financial support throughout the study within the scope of 2211-E Direct National Scholarship Programme for PhD Students.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10479-023-05490-4
dc.identifier.endpage542
dc.identifier.issn0254-5330
dc.identifier.issn1572-9338
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9694-5196
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85168290630
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage505
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05490-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/11728
dc.identifier.volume352
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001048087300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Operations Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectVolatility prediction
dc.subjectKernel regression
dc.subjectEWMA
dc.subjectCross-validation smoothing parameter
dc.subjectHeston-Nandi GARCH model
dc.subjectBitcoin
dc.titlePredicting the volatility of Bitcoin returns based on kernel regression
dc.typeArticle

Files