A Reply to Option Value of Harvesting Revisited (The Comment)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Univ Chicago Press
Access Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Abstract
Li's results (1998) are correct and robust. The Comment offers an interesting perspective from real-options theory albeit misguided-from a resource-economics point of view. In particular, the lack of sensitivity in the optimal harvest trigger to biomass uncertainty is questionable. This reply begins with a general overview of resource-economic principles and the role of real options in them. A specific reply to each point raised in The Comment will then be addressed.
Description
Keywords
Journal or Series
Marine Resource Economics
WoS Q Value
Scopus Q Value
Volume
24
Issue
1










