Single and binary adsorption of azo and anthraquinone dyes by chitosan-based hydrogel: Selectivity factor and Box-Behnken process design

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Access Rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Abstract

Comparative removal of two cationic dyes, Basic Green 4 (BG4) and Basic Yellow 28 (BY28), by chemically modified nanoclay was optimized using the central composite design. The chemically modified nanoclay was characterized by SEM, EDX, FTIR, XRD and BET techniques. The average crystal size of nanoclay was about 16.5 nm. The accuracy of the model and regression coefficients was appraised by employing the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results revealed a good agreement between the predicted values, as obtained by the model, and the experimental values for both BG4 (R2 = 0.960) and BY28 (R2 = 0.927). The optimum conditions proposed by central composite design to reach the maximum dye removal through adsorption process. Under the optimum conditions, the removal efficiency of BG4 and BY28 were 82.35% and 98.78%, respectively. For BG4 and BY28, the pH of solution and adsorbent dosage were found to be the key factors that controlled dye adsorption, respectively.

Description

Due to copyright restrictions, the access to the publisher version (published version) of this article is only available via subscription. You may click URI and have access to the Publisher Version of this article through the publisher web site or online databases, if your Library or institution has subscription to the related journal or publication.

Keywords

Cationic dyes, Experimental design, Optimization, Modified nanoclay, Adsorption

Journal or Series

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

WoS Q Value

Scopus Q Value

Volume

104

Issue

Citation

Oladipo AA, Gazi M, Yilmaz E. “Single and binary adsorption of azo and antraquinone dyes by chitosan based hydrogel: Selective factor and Box-Bahnken process design” Chemical Engineering Research and Design (2015) 104(C) 264-279.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By