Does fiscal decentralization andeco-innovationpromote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries

dc.contributor.authorJi, Xiangfeng
dc.contributor.authorUmar, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorAli, Shahid
dc.contributor.authorAli, Wajid
dc.contributor.authorTang, Kai
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Zeeshan
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study highlights the importance of fiscal decentralization in promoting a sustainable environment. The literature on the importance of fiscal decentralization in affecting environmental quality is scant, and thus, this study attempts to fill the gap by incorporating the linear and nonlinear terms of fiscal decentralization as possible determinants for CO(2)emissions. Particularly, we utilize data from seven highly fiscally decentralized countries, that is, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Spain, and Switzerland, over the period 1990-2018. For empirical analysis, advanced panel data econometric tools are used that can deal with both heterogeneous coefficients and dependence of cross-sections. The findings confirm that linear and nonlinear terms of fiscal decentralization improve the environment by reducing CO(2)emissions. Moreover, gross domestic product (GDP) increases, while eco-innovation and renewable energy usage reduce CO(2)emissions. This study recommends that any policy that targets green growth will affect CO(2)emissions. Moreover, policies targeting fiscal decentralization, GDP, eco-innovation, and renewable energy will play the role in more than 1 year, namely in the long run.
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Science Foundation of China [71801138]; Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR201709210154]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first author is partially supported by project funded by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71801138) and by project funded by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR201709210154).
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sd.2132
dc.identifier.endpage88
dc.identifier.issn0968-0802
dc.identifier.issn1099-1719
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4878-0187
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5773-5954
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6626-6221
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1374-0836
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2056-9398
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090951979
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage79
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/11514
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000569321700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofSustainable Development
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectCO(2)emissions
dc.subjecteco-innovation
dc.subjectfiscal decentralization
dc.subjectrenewable energy
dc.subjectsustainable environment
dc.titleDoes fiscal decentralization andeco-innovationpromote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries
dc.typeArticle

Files