Estimating the value of life and injury for pedestrians using a stated preference framework

dc.contributor.authorNiroomand, Naghmeh
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Glenn P.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:39:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The incidence of pedestrian death over the period 2010 to 2014 per 1000,000 in North Cyprus is about 2.5 times that of the EU, with 10.5 times more pedestrian road injuries than deaths. With the prospect of North Cyprus entering the EU, many investments need to be undertaken to improve road safety in order to reach EU benchmarks. Method: We conducted a stated choice experiment to identify the preferences and tradeoffs of pedestrians in North Cyprus for improved walking times, pedestrian costs, and safety. The choice of route was examined using mixed logit models to obtain the marginal utilities associated with each attribute of the routes that consumers chose. These were used to estimate the individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) to save walking time and to avoid pedestrian fatalities and injuries. We then used the results to obtain community-wide estimates of the value of a statistical life (VSL) saved, the value of an injury (VI) prevented, and the value per hour of walking time saved. Results: The estimate of the VSL was 699,434 and the estimate of VI was 20,077. These values are consistent, after adjusting for differences in incomes, with the median results of similar studies done for EU countries. The estimated value of time to pedestrians is 720 per person hour. Conclusions: The ratio of deaths to injuries is much higher for pedestrians than for road accidents, and this is completely consistent with the higher estimated WTP to avoid a pedestrian accident than to avoid a car accident The value of time of 7.20 is quite high relative to the wages earned. Practical applications: Findings provide a set of information on the VRR for fatalities and injuries and the value of pedestrian time that is critical for conducing ex ante appraisals of investments to improve pedestrian safety. (C) 2017 National Safety Council Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.006
dc.identifier.endpage87
dc.identifier.issn0022-4375
dc.identifier.issn1879-1247
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2122-1959
dc.identifier.pmid28882280
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021392151
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage81
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/13103
dc.identifier.volume62
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000411543500009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Safety Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectWillingness to pay
dc.subjectChoice experiment
dc.subjectValue of a statistical life
dc.subjectValue of an injury
dc.subjectPedestrian time
dc.titleEstimating the value of life and injury for pedestrians using a stated preference framework
dc.typeArticle

Files