Latencies to first interictal epileptiform discharges in different seizure types during video-EEG monitoring

dc.contributor.authorKoc, Guray
dc.contributor.authorMorkavuk, Gulin
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Efdal
dc.contributor.authorKaradas, Omer
dc.contributor.authorLeventoglu, Alev
dc.contributor.authorUnay, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorGokcil, Zeki
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) have high diagnostic value concerning patients with epilepsy and the instances of obtaining IEDs increase with longer recording times. However, the merit of a single, extended electroencephalography (EEG) recording in detecting IEDs has not been substantiated. We aimed to determine the optimal duration of an EEG required to diagnose epilepsy in different seizure types. Methods: Overall, 84 patients-29 with generalised onset epilepsy and 55 with focal onset epilepsy were evaluated. Long-term video electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM) was analysed to find the first definite IED besides assessing the first seizure and latency. Results: The median latency of the first IED (12 min, ranging from 1 to 440 min vs. 55 min, ranging from 2 to 7500 min; p = 0.014) and the median duration of a VEM recording (2 d, ranging from 1 to 10 d vs. 3 d, ranging from 1 to 10 d; p = 0.012) were found significantly lower in the generalised epilepsy group compared with that in the focal epilepsy group. Conclusions: Generalised onset epilepsy showed a significantly shorter latency to IED and VEM duration compared with focal onset epilepsy. In our data set, all the patients with generalised onset epilepsy had interictal IED within 10 h, but the patients with focal onset epilepsy required monitoring for three days to obtain IED.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.013
dc.identifier.endpage240
dc.identifier.issn1059-1311
dc.identifier.issn1532-2688
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7522-8585
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0457-3722
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5432-8624
dc.identifier.pmid31121547
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065758214
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage235
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/13423
dc.identifier.volume69
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000474500800041
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofSeizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectInterictal epileptiform activity
dc.subjectEpilepsy, focal onset seizure
dc.subjectgeneralised onset seizure
dc.subjectVideo-EEG monitoring
dc.titleLatencies to first interictal epileptiform discharges in different seizure types during video-EEG monitoring
dc.typeArticle

Files