Acute and Chronic Immunological Responses to Different Exercise Modalities: A Narrative Review

dc.contributor.authorSever, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Sila
dc.contributor.authorKoz, Mitat
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:24:12Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between exercise and immune function has been widely studied, yet findings remain inconsistent regarding how different exercise modalities and intensities influence acute and chronic immunological responses. Previous reviews have often focused on single exercise types or limited outcomes, leaving a gap for an integrated synthesis. This narrative review aims to address this gap by summarizing and comparing immunological effects across aerobic exercise, resistance training, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), blood flow restriction (BFR), isometric exercise, mind-body interventions, and hypoxic training. A structured narrative approach was adopted. Literature published between January 2000 and December 2024 was searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Experimental and observational studies on humans and animal models were included, with study selection and data extraction performed by two reviewers. Findings were synthesized thematically by exercise modality to capture both acute and chronic immune responses. Twenty-four eligible studies were identified. Aerobic and mind-body exercises consistently demonstrated anti-inflammatory and immunoprotective effects, including increased IL-10 production, improved T cell profiles, and reduced inflammatory markers. Isometric training showed favorable modulation of cytokines and T cell balance, while resistance training evidence was limited but suggested cortisol-lowering benefits. HIIT, BFR, and hypoxic exercise produced mixed results, often combining transient pro-inflammatory responses with immunological benefits. Acute and chronic immunological responses to exercise are highly modality- and intensity-dependent. Aerobic and mind-body interventions provide the most consistent benefits, whereas HIIT, BFR, and hypoxic training show variable effects. Further high-quality trials are needed to clarify mechanisms and guide exercise-based immune recommendations.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare13172244
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issue17
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3001-3609
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9974-8718
dc.identifier.pmid40941596
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105015828182
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172244
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/10069
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001569785300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcare
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectcytokines
dc.subjectexercise
dc.subjectinflammation mediators
dc.subjectimmune system
dc.subjectlymphocytes
dc.subjectphysical activity
dc.titleAcute and Chronic Immunological Responses to Different Exercise Modalities: A Narrative Review
dc.typeReview Article

Files