Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey

dc.contributor.authorFirth, Alice M.
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Suzanne M.
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Ping
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Jane
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Heather
dc.contributor.authorBridges, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorMurtagh, Fliss E. M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:52:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Specialist palliative care services have various configurations of staff, processes and interventions, which determine how care is delivered. Currently, there is no consistent way to define and distinguish these different models of care. Aim: To identify the core components that characterise and differentiate existing models of specialist palliative care in the United Kingdom. Design: Mixed-methods study: (1) semi-structured interviews to identify criteria, (2) two-round Delphi study to rank/refine criteria, and (3) structured interviews to test/refine criteria. Setting/participants: Specialist palliative care stakeholders from hospice inpatient, hospital advisory, and community settings. Results: (1) Semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical leads, from eight UK organisations (five hospice inpatient units, two hospital advisory teams, five community teams), provided 34 preliminary criteria. (2) Delphi study: Round 1 (54 participants): thirty-four criteria presented, seven removed and seven added. Round 2 (30 participants): these 34 criteria were ranked with the 15 highest ranked criteria, including setting, type of care, size of service, diagnoses, disciplines, mode of care, types of interventions, 'out-of-hours' components (referrals, times, disciplines, mode of care, type of care), external education, use of measures, bereavement follow-up and complex grief provision. (3) Structured interviews with 21 UK service leads (six hospice inpatients, four hospital advisory and nine community teams) refined the criteria from (1) and (2), and provided four further contextual criteria (team purpose, funding, self-referral acceptance and discharge). Conclusion: In this innovative study, we derive 20 criteria to characterise and differentiate models of specialist palliative care - a major paradigm shift to enable accurate reporting and comparison in practice and research.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Health [RP-PG-1210-12015] Funding Source: Medline; National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-1210-12015, NF-SI-0611-10209] Funding Source: researchfish
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269216319858237
dc.identifier.endpage1124
dc.identifier.issn0269-2163
dc.identifier.issn1477-030X
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3687-1313
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1289-3726
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2200-1680
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0726-0502
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0979-7047
dc.identifier.pmid31250704
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068320363
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1114
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319858237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/15628
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480252700018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofPalliative Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectpalliative care
dc.subjectDelphi technique
dc.subjectmodels
dc.subjectorganisational
dc.subjecthospices
dc.titleEstablishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
dc.typeArticle

Files