Comments on "A decision feedback recurrent neural equalizer as an infinite impulse response filter"

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHacio?lu, Kadri
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:01:21Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis correspondence corrects and clarifies some notation inconsistencies and the absence of some definitions in a previous paper by Ong et al.. In addition, we show that the assumptions made in the derivation of the MSEDFRNEMSERNE invalidate the final result given in Ong et al.and lead to an unfair comparison between the two equalizers. We present a simulation that best compares the two equalizers. © 2000 IEEE.
dc.identifier.issn1053-587X
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33747740102
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage12061207
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/8441
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260204
dc.subjectNeural equalizers
dc.subjectNonlinear equalization
dc.subjectRecurrent neural networks
dc.titleComments on "A decision feedback recurrent neural equalizer as an infinite impulse response filter"
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu