Calculating the collapse margin ratio of RC frames using soft computing models

dc.contributor.authorSadeghpour, Ali
dc.contributor.authorOzay, Giray
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:26:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe Collapse Margin Ratio (CMR) is a notable index used for seismic assessment of the structures. As proposed by FEMA P695, a set of analyses including the Nonlinear Static Analysis (NSA), Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), together with Fragility Analysis, which are typically time-taking and computationally unaffordable, need to be conducted, so that the CMR could be obtained. To address this issue and to achieve a quick and efficient method to estimate the CMR, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Response Surface Method (RSM), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) will be introduced in the current research. Accordingly, using the NSA results, an attempt was made to find a fast and efficient approach to derive the CMR. To this end, 5016 IDA analyses based on FEMA P695 methodology on 114 various Reinforced Concrete (RC) frames with 1 to 12 stories have been carried out. In this respect, five parameters have been used as the independent and desired inputs of the systems. On the other hand, the CMR is regarded as the output of the systems. Accordingly, a double hidden layer neural network with Levenberg-Marquardt training and learning algorithm was taken into account. Moreover, in the RSM approach, the quadratic system incorporating 20 parameters was implemented. Correspondingly, the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) has been employed to discuss the results taken from the developed model. Additionally, the essential parameters and interactions are extracted, and input parameters are sorted according to their importance. Moreover, the ANFIS using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system was employed. Finally, all methods were compared, and the effective parameters and associated relationships were extracted. In contrast to the other approaches, the ANFIS provided the best efficiency and high accuracy with the minimum desired errors. Comparatively, it was obtained that the ANN method is more effective than the RSM and has a higher regression coefficient and lower statistical errors.
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/sem.2022.83.3.327
dc.identifier.endpage340
dc.identifier.issn1225-4568
dc.identifier.issn1598-6217
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9471-5247
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140088948
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage327
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.83.3.327
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/10392
dc.identifier.volume83
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000866219400004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechno-Press
dc.relation.ispartofStructural Engineering and Mechanics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectadaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
dc.subjectartificial neural network (ANN)
dc.subjectcollapse margin ratio (CMR)
dc.subjectincremental dynamic analysis (IDA)
dc.subjectresponse surface method (RSM)
dc.titleCalculating the collapse margin ratio of RC frames using soft computing models
dc.typeArticle

Files