Truth-Teller-Liar Puzzles with Self-Reference

dc.contributor.authorAlzboon, Laith
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Benedek
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:24:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we use commonsense reasoning and graph representation to study logical puzzles with three types of people. Strong Truth-Tellers say only true atomic statements, Strong Liars say only false atomic statements, and Strong Crazy people say only self-contradicting statements. Self-contradicting statements are connected to the Liar paradox, i.e., no Truth-Teller or a Liar could say I am a Liar. A puzzle is clear if it only contains its given statements to solve it, and a puzzle is good if it has exactly one solution. It is known that there is no clear and good Strong Truth-Teller-Strong Liar (also called SS) puzzle. However, as we prove here, there are good and clear Strong Truth-Teller, Strong Liar and Strong Crazy puzzles (SSS-puzzles). The newly investigated type 'Crazy' drastically changes the scenario. Some properties of the new types of puzzles are analyzed, and some statistics are also given.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/math8020190
dc.identifier.issn2227-7390
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7715-9306
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85080127546
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/math8020190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/10104
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000519234000045
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofMathematics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectSS-puzzles
dc.subjectSSS-puzzles
dc.subjectCrazy people
dc.subjectself-contradictory statements
dc.subjectpuzzle-graphs
dc.titleTruth-Teller-Liar Puzzles with Self-Reference
dc.typeArticle

Files