A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Hybridity in Architecture: A Case Study of Baghdad University

dc.contributor.authorAl Braifkani, Eman
dc.contributor.authorGunce, Kagan
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T18:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentDoğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the concept of hybridity in architecture, shaped by cultural exchange, globalization, and evolving socio-political contexts. In this research, hybridity in architecture is defined as a dynamic process that emerges within boundary spaces, where physical elements interact with evolving cultural, social, and political forces, resulting in adaptable and multilayered architectural environments. Despite the significance of hybridity in architecture, existing research lacks a comprehensive and systematic framework for its analysis. To bridge this gap, the study develops a conceptual framework that integrates archival research, literature synthesis, and an architectural analysis. The methodology combines a qualitative analysis of historical documents and design drawings to identify eight key indicators of hybridity-form, typology, program, mixed-use, multi-layering, user mixing, border spaces, and control/resistance-and applies them to a case study of the University of Baghdad. These indicators embody the interaction between the static and kinetic aspects of hybridity. The Static Aspect refers to the tangible outcomes of hybridity-such as mixed forms and functions-that materialize in built structures. In contrast, the Kinetic Aspect reflects the intangible dimensions, including ongoing social and cultural dynamics and shifts in power relations, which continuously reshape these hybrid forms. Together, these aspects illustrate that hybridity is both a product and a process, where material expressions emerge from social negotiations and, in turn, influence future adaptations. The findings reveal that the hybrid architecture evolves through complex interactions among historical references, contemporary needs, and socio-political forces. By establishing a systematic methodology for analyzing hybridity, this study bridges theoretical discourse with practical applications, providing architects and researchers with a robust analytical tool to assess hybrid architectural spaces within culturally diverse contexts. It also reinforces the understanding of hybridity as a dynamic force-one that not only results in physical architectural expressions but also evolves through ongoing cultural, social, and political interactions.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su17094154
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1231-8177
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1557-2987
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004909149
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su17094154
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11129/10251
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001486623500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260204
dc.subjectarchitectural hybridity
dc.subjectpostcolonial architectural adaptation
dc.subjectmodern architectural heritage
dc.subjectcultural sustainability
dc.titleA Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Hybridity in Architecture: A Case Study of Baghdad University
dc.typeArticle

Files